X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject:	Re: real beginer
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:22:48 -0700
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<k675bo$q08$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<1350998927796-93898 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <1351002701854-93906 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <5086C75A DOT 2060306 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <5086D14D DOT 3070406 AT gmail DOT com> <1351021580080-93918 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com> <k671qe$rq1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <1351028816534-93921 DOT post AT n5 DOT nabble DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
In-Reply-To:	<1351028816534-93921.post@n5.nabble.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/23/2012 2:46 PM, Trixie wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 12:46 PM, Trixie wrote:
>>> I have liblapack-devel instaled and did ./configure and make . It took
>>> some
>>> time but it finished.
>> Did make finish successfully, returning a 0 status? Did you have a
>> bigdft.exe file? If you type "ls bigdft" do you see an executable?
>> (Note: The file's name is actually bigdft.exe but ls will list it as
>> bigdft).
> /i type ls bigdft and there's "No such file or directory" and i cant find
> bigdft.exe file anywhere. That means install and make didnt finish well,
> right?
Probably. You could do something like: make; echo "Status from make was $?"

The $? is the return status from the previous command. That will only 
tell you if the make turned 0 for success. The output of make would be 
much more instructive.
> posinp.xyz is there./
AFAICT posinp.xyz is not produced from the make.

You really should approach the people who maintain this package and ask 
them about it. This package is not Cygwin.
-- 
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
By the time you make ends meet, they move the ends.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -