X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:34:09 +0200
From:	Josef Wolf <jw AT raven DOT inka DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: latex no longer works after update
Message-ID:	<20121011103409.GC7455@raven.wolf.lan>
Mail-Followup-To:	Josef Wolf <jw AT raven DOT inka DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20121010142054 DOT GA7455 AT raven DOT wolf DOT lan> <50758E21 DOT 3090909 AT etr-usa DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<50758E21.3090909@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:02:57AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> What does "which latex" say?

/usr/bin/latex

> Other curious things in your cygcheck output:
> 
> >Warning: Mount entries should not have a trailing (back)slash

OK

> You might want to fix that.  But also:
> 
> >c:\              /c         system  text
> 
> ...repeat for multiple drives...
> 
> >cygdrive prefix  /cygdrive  user    binary,auto
> 
> You can probably simplify your fstab like so:
> 
>     D:/cygwin/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0 0
>     D:/cygwin/lib /usr/lib ntfs binary 0 0
>     none / cygdrive binary,posix=0,user 0 0
> 
> The last line automatically gets rid of the "/cygdrive" path part,
> so all drive letters appear at the root of the Cygwin path tree.

I'm not sure I understand this. Should I remove all my fstab entries and
replace with the three lines shown above? Will I still be able to access the
drives with /c/foo/bar?

Furthermore: your example has this line:

     none / cygdrive binary,posix=0,user 0 0

while the original template had this line:

     none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user 0 0

Which one is the correct one?

Here's how my fstab currently looks like:

  # For a description of the file format, see the Users Guide
  # http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table
  
  # This is default anyway:
  # none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user 0 0
  c:/ /c fat auto 0 0
  d:/ /d fat auto 0 0
  h:/ /h fat auto 0 0
  n:/ /n fat auto 0 0
  t:/ /t fat auto 0 0

> And I can't help but ask:
> >USER = 'dasbinich'

Nope. I just tried to hide some private information ;-)

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -