delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/09/06/23:23:25

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <50496887.8030702@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:22:47 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Using rand_r and -std=c99 with gcc
References: <CAKObCaogGuK=U2KqsZF3JbBuR6v-afJj0u-arPOuX++H-Wu6Qw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAKObCaqZ-OofLUPNa6xuAoQmZAfFrz7jSZS+TY2iRbsK-EtZWg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CAKObCaqZ-OofLUPNa6xuAoQmZAfFrz7jSZS+TY2iRbsK-EtZWg@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 9/6/2012 10:37 PM, Jason Gross wrote:
> Hi,
> If I try to compile a C program which uses rand_r with gcc 4.5.3, with
> -std=c99, I get
>
> warning: implicit declaration of function 'rand_r'.
>
> Google gave me http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00417.html and
> http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00800.html, which explains why
> this happens, but these messages are 3 years old.  Additionally,
> http://linux.die.net/man/3/rand_r suggests that rand_r is c99.  Are
> there plans to update stdlib.h to account for c99?  If I look through
> the http://linux.die.net/man pages and figure out which things are c99
> and submit a patch, will it get checked in?

The Linux man page you point to has this to say about rand_r's conformance:

   The function rand_r() is from POSIX.1-2001. POSIX.1-2008 marks rand_r() 
as obsolete.

The fact that rand_r doesn't list c99 and is obsoleted in POSIX.1-2008
makes me dubious that newlib folks are going to jump at a patch to add
it to c99.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019