delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-id: | <50496887.8030702@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:22:47 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-to: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Using rand_r and -std=c99 with gcc |
References: | <CAKObCaogGuK=U2KqsZF3JbBuR6v-afJj0u-arPOuX++H-Wu6Qw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAKObCaqZ-OofLUPNa6xuAoQmZAfFrz7jSZS+TY2iRbsK-EtZWg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-reply-to: | <CAKObCaqZ-OofLUPNa6xuAoQmZAfFrz7jSZS+TY2iRbsK-EtZWg@mail.gmail.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 9/6/2012 10:37 PM, Jason Gross wrote: > Hi, > If I try to compile a C program which uses rand_r with gcc 4.5.3, with > -std=c99, I get > > warning: implicit declaration of function 'rand_r'. > > Google gave me http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00417.html and > http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00800.html, which explains why > this happens, but these messages are 3 years old. Additionally, > http://linux.die.net/man/3/rand_r suggests that rand_r is c99. Are > there plans to update stdlib.h to account for c99? If I look through > the http://linux.die.net/man pages and figure out which things are c99 > and submit a patch, will it get checked in? The Linux man page you point to has this to say about rand_r's conformance: The function rand_r() is from POSIX.1-2001. POSIX.1-2008 marks rand_r() as obsolete. The fact that rand_r doesn't list c99 and is obsoleted in POSIX.1-2008 makes me dubious that newlib folks are going to jump at a patch to add it to c99. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |