X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<50475BC2.8040702@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:03:46 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2
References:	<E961D94A-6040-4924-9F38-9DF6CEA36134 AT mac DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<E961D94A-6040-4924-9F38-9DF6CEA36134@mac.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear
> that  maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment.

 From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>:

cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues 
regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If you are 
maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages that is 
distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be subscribed to this list.


> NOTE:  The current version of tar (1.25) available from cygwin is broken
> and doesn't work for amanda :-(  I've created a patch for the 1.26
> version of tar to create a working amanda installation on my machine.
> Not sure how to get the current maintainer to update the official version
> to 1.26.

If it's a general problem with tar, you'll want to contact the upstream
maintainer.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -