X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<502E5D7D.5050503@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:04:29 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Options for getting mandatory locking in cygwin1.dll
References:	<announce DOT 5029275C DOT 4040009 AT etr-usa DOT com> <502C0B7D DOT 10909 AT etr-usa DOT com> <loom DOT 20120816T092134-266 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120816085016 DOT GB5536 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502CCBB1 DOT 2070600 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120816105507 DOT GD17546 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502CE120 DOT 4050900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120816122654 DOT GG17546 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <502D4F2F DOT 5080306 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120817093737 DOT GB26407 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20120817093737.GB26407@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/17/2012 3:37 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 16 13:51, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 8/16/2012 6:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>> You are aware that there's no chance at all to implement the UNIX
>>> locking API calls correctly this way...
>>
>> Cygwin could follow Linux and implement 'mount -o mand'
>
> A "mand" mount option sounds like a really interesting idea, together
> with the special group permission settings as described in the Linux
> fcntl(2) man page.  Maybe we can even relax that by making the "mand"
> option the default setting,

I don't see why -o mand is a good default.  It isn't the default on 
Linux.  Besides, wouldn't that dredge up all the hairy problems with 
Windows' by-default mandatory locking?

All I'm wishing for here is a way to say "this subtree should use 
mandatory locks".  The user makes the choice, presumably for good reasons.

I like my per-process Cygwin-specific solution better, though.  In that 
case, libsqlite would make the decision, because it knows that on 
Windows, mandatory locking of SQLite DB files is almost certainly the 
right thing.  The rare counterexample like Achim's can be handled 
through an environment variable or similar; if set, it would cause 
libsqlite to pass 0 to my proposed cygwin_set_mandatory_locking() call, 
or skip calling it entirely.

> In the next
> couple of months I have probably no time to implement it.  It's not
> overly tricky to implement it, as far as I can see, but, as usual,
> somebody has to do it.

I'm totally fine with limping by with the current solution, where we do 
locking the "Wrong (tm)" way in libsqlite for now, with the hope that we 
can fix it the Right way later in the Cygwin DLL itself.

Is there old code in the DLL's code repo that does this?  I mean, did 
the Cygwin DLL use mandatory locking once upon a time, which was 
replaced by its current advisory locking scheme, or has it always 
provided advisory locking only?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -