X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:14:36 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system
Message-ID:	<20120814171436.GG18059@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<loom DOT 20120812T142816-982 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5027B4AC DOT 7070407 AT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20120814T020312-509 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A495FFE3C AT ENFIRHMBX1 DOT datcon DOT co DOT uk> <502A5675 DOT 8010202 AT gmail DOT com> <CANLSjUteBXH7P6fBFqsvK3S_F2kZdVT9Qn9wpYGAX-R-4GEPog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120814150922 DOT GD18059 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CANLSjUtVqVLP3jT3H3oBHT87Bfxe3ssRWBp9q2n_DRLv6Z2vxg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug 14 10:56, Paul Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Wow.  That's rather unexpected.  Unfortunately the error code -2 is just
> > an artefact, not the actual error code.  I fixed that in CVS.  Did you
> > try if rebaseall fixes this issue?
> >
> >
> 
> OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually on the machine
> in question, and will try this tonight. I will report tomorrow on
> results.
> 
> I will say that I did just do a fresh install of cygwin for this.
> Should cygwin work straight out of the box, or is the rebaseall needed
> to tailor to specific machine?

There's autorebase, which is called from setup, but the method is not
entirely foolproof.  If you installed exactly once and then don't start
setup again unless new packages are available, you're ok, but if you
start setup a couple of times to install more packages you forgot in
the first run, then autorebase won't be triggered and the DLLs installed
in the subsequent setup runs won't be rebased.  A manual rebaseall 
will fix that.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -