X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<50298001.50502@cornell.edu>
References:	<CAG9p0OTFfN+Za6wikt9Aa-1RqtKKCr7M39YHuwDHNKqbdPjpfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG9p0ORVO1F=vTgg-nEF0UBcdEMaOLOFh5LFnbSMeLm1mz0q8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50291FED DOT 4090705 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAG9p0OTCQQEWTPsFARtE1wz7+uTWkWJ7nygs_6Z9dqF3BLFEzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50298001 DOT 50502 AT cornell DOT edu>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:47:08 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAG9p0OTQc+=yeHVL7YmOqPaACpSW5HzEDZz7a-NxHceB_GzE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin setup scrambled permissions
From:	Lord Laraby <lord DOT laraby AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> wrote:
> On 8/13/2012 5:49 PM, Lord Laraby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> D:\Programs\cygwin\etc\postinstall>autorebase.bat
>>>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i686-cygwin-threads-64int/CORE/cygperl5_14_2.dll:
>>>> skipped be
>>>> cause nonexistent.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is just a warning, which you can ignore.  See
>>> Ken
>>
>> Aye. That I see now. However, shouldn't autorebase.bat actually do
>> something? Or is it not like rebaseall? My guess is it's only trying
>> to rebase that specific file and failing. If that's so, I'm fine with
>> it.
>
> autorebase.bat does run rebaseall, and there's no reason to think it isn't
> doing anything.  It's not failing; it's just reporting that there was one
> specific file that it couldn't rebase.  If there's no other error message,
> you can assume it did its job.
>
>
> Ken

Well I say it's not doing anything because the prompt returns
immediately and prints the error above. I have run rebaseall several
times over the course of using Cygwin tools. It nearly always runs for
at least 20 seconds and often much longer.

So, it seemed odd.

-- 
Lord Laraby

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -