delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <50298001.50502@cornell.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:30:25 -0400 |
From: | Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin setup scrambled permissions |
References: | <CAG9p0OTFfN+Za6wikt9Aa-1RqtKKCr7M39YHuwDHNKqbdPjpfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAG9p0ORVO1F=vTgg-nEF0UBcdEMaOLOFh5LFnbSMeLm1mz0q8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50291FED DOT 4090705 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAG9p0OTCQQEWTPsFARtE1wz7+uTWkWJ7nygs_6Z9dqF3BLFEzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <CAG9p0OTCQQEWTPsFARtE1wz7+uTWkWJ7nygs_6Z9dqF3BLFEzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: | Pawpaw |
X-Original-Sender: | kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Mon Aug 13 18:30:29 2012 |
X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: | CU_White_List_Override |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 8/13/2012 5:49 PM, Lord Laraby wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >>> >>> D:\Programs\cygwin\etc\postinstall>autorebase.bat >>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i686-cygwin-threads-64int/CORE/cygperl5_14_2.dll: >>> skipped be >>> cause nonexistent. >> >> >> This is just a warning, which you can ignore. See >> Ken > > Aye. That I see now. However, shouldn't autorebase.bat actually do > something? Or is it not like rebaseall? My guess is it's only trying > to rebase that specific file and failing. If that's so, I'm fine with > it. autorebase.bat does run rebaseall, and there's no reason to think it isn't doing anything. It's not failing; it's just reporting that there was one specific file that it couldn't rebase. If there's no other error message, you can assume it did its job. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |