X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX18cKFB5Q1gU12ZF+vYIhIj8
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:12:35 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Please test snapshots
Message-ID:	<20120810181235.GA17158@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<86k3xcaxxh DOT fsf AT w2139spb DOT ru DOT yotateam DOT com> <50203227 DOT 50207 AT dancol DOT org> <50205E0E DOT 3060406 AT dancol DOT org> <20120808215909 DOT GA29761 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <loom DOT 20120809T111739-607 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <5023CF06 DOT 2030006 AT dancol DOT org> <loom DOT 20120810T082432-17 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20120810142515 DOT GE11601 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <87r4reocjf DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<87r4reocjf.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:57:24PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>> You're not really giving us much to go on.
>
>I don't have anything else, these are the only two (small) issues I've
>seen after installation of the latest snapshot.
>
>> A <defunct> process doesn't mean that something is not properly
>> terminated.  Is this also a tcsh shell running git?
>
>Actually it was make started in tcsh, which then forked git (I think it
>goes through bash for this, but I'm not sure).  I've killed make while
>git was running.  Anyway, the computer will be freshly booted on Monday,
>I'll see if that is still reproduceable then.

...and those are the kind of details which allows us to at least make
educated guesses about problems.  Showing a "defunct" ps listing, not so
much...

It's probably too late to ask but is the make process still around?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -