X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<50197B86.9060308@cornell.edu>
Date:	Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:55:02 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: How to keep a dependency from [continually] appearing in setup
References:	<CAM-A7MA-VX7yD=iEW5o3c+d+WCLybYkJMhcrSX_nZ_EPDy_R4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50185716 DOT 8050504 AT cornell DOT edu> <50191B67 DOT 5010106 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <50192B7B DOT 5060501 AT cornell DOT edu> <50193AA8 DOT 8050307 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
In-Reply-To:	<50193AA8.8050307@cs.utoronto.ca>
X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED:	Pawpaw
X-Original-Sender:	kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Wed Aug 1 14:55:06 2012
X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON:	CU_White_List_Override
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/1/2012 10:18 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> It can be argued that emacs-auctex should not pull in texlive. Most
> users installing emacs-auctex will already have some flavor of tex in
> place, and not necessarily the cygwin one (like the OP, or perhaps a
> MikTex user). Plus, the error message is pretty intuitive and the
> solution very simple, if latex is not there: "latex: no such command"
> ==> "maybe I should install latex." Therefore, the expected aggregate

There's more to it than that.  emacs-auctex installs stuff needed for 
its preview feature in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/.  This won't 
be found by native texlive or by MikTeX.

> frustration of users who installed auctex without latex available would
> likely be far lower than the aggregate frustration of users wanting to
> install auctex and getting saddled with an unwanted redundant texlive
> distribution (for which there is no easy solution).

Why is this so frustrating?  It doesn't do any harm (except waste a 
small amount of disk space) to install Cygwin's texlive in parallel with 
native texlive.  Just make sure the bin directory of the latter precedes 
/usr/bin in PATH.  I myself have both installed, since I sometimes find 
it useful for testing purposes to be able to switch from one to the 
other (by temporarily changing PATH).

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -