X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-version:	1.0
Message-id:	<50196A0D.9010003@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:40:29 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Perl 5.14.2 seems to expect gcc-4
References:	<CADdV=MtsR0qYbSM_+yH2xDXEr5ZBchV+p0LzXxSkzRCSVeJ8Sw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CADdV=MvE8ZSyxPp-U_LnXK32=A=EaK_1LmwJrO6+rb5uOEUhzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <A0DB01D693D8EF439496BC8B037A0AEF0F4769A3 AT xmb-rcd-x15 DOT cisco DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<A0DB01D693D8EF439496BC8B037A0AEF0F4769A3@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 8/1/2012 11:46 AM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>>>
>>> Cygwin updated perl to 5.14.2 on my system and now I can’t compile
>>> XML::LibXML.  It seems that
>>>
>>> c:\lib\perl5\5.14\i686-cygwin-threads-64int\Config.pm
>>>
>>> expects cc to be gcc-4.  Gcc-4 doesn’t exist yet, it seems.  What’s
>>> going on here?
>>
>> Sorry, scratch that, gcc-4 is available.  I got confused by the separate
>> version schemes (which I realize are necessary, but easy to miss when
>> you’re a bit stressed out.)
>
> Did Cygwin "setup.exe" prompt you to install the "gcc-4" package when
> you  updated perl?
>
> I thought "setup.exe" would prompt the user if any additional packages
> needed to be installed.

It does this for run-time dependencies, not build-time.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -