X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_CG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Adam Dinwoodie <Adam DOT Dinwoodie AT metaswitch DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: automatically using pipe_byte for certain EXE's
Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:34:48 +0000
Deferred-Delivery:	Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:34:00 +0000
Message-ID:	<CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A43640586@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
References:	<5011587F DOT 1000304 AT gmail DOT com> <50116934 DOT 6010002 AT dancol DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<50116934.6010002@dancol.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q6QGbGDH020040

Daniel Colascione wrote:
> I still don't know why anyone wouldn't want to use pipe_byte all the time.

I think that was covered pretty explicitly by cgf in reply to you some time
ago:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00662.html

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -