X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<50105CBC.2070508@tlinx.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:53:16 -0700
From:	Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Confusing, but not fatal bug....rmdir removed network dir (rename to .____00000hexnum/)
References:	<500B961D DOT 6050303 AT tlinx DOT org> <20120723091400 DOT GC12741 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <500F4AE6 DOT 8090208 AT tlinx DOT org> <20120725123445 DOT GH29107 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20120725123445.GH29107@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> Anyway, I have a fix for that.  You didn't explicitely allow to send
> a test DLL, so I just applied the patch to CVS.  Please test the next
> developer snapshot.
----
	Sorry, I thought it would be implicit that I gave you everything
you asked for -- not that I really NEED the dll patch immediately,
(first time I've encountered this problem in a dozen years of cygwin
usage..)..

AND NOTE: --

	This problem occurred to 1 out of 54 dirs in my Pictures dir
and 1 out of 267 dirs in my Docs dir.


	That was a failure rate of 0.62%, and the impact was a
directory being renamed (no files deleted or lost).

	If it happened most the time, I'd think it was
serious or if it deleted data, critical, but given those
rates...I wouldn't *only* suspect cygwin, samba has more
than it's share of problem being in a similar position as you
in trying to be win-compat in a dearth of information about
how to do so.

	My file server is running samba 3.5.9 on a 3.2.21 linux kernel
on an openSnoozy 12.1 distro, FWIW...other samba versions may
be different.

	So if you want, I'm willing to try a fix, or I can
wait...either way is fine..


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -