X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References:	<CAO73BAA6GiKkH8rTRZHbTYQfxFUPhjgxi3NMZJmZs2iQs=Qo2g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120720170423 DOT GA850 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAO73BADvHgqUsALirOz-bNgQJG9Xsa_u7bQHg5BuRRD7x-3dRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120720174819 DOT GA2064 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:12:55 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAO73BADVdY-+Yj55Nsn=WsT2Fqr9XvSr6tQr9f+Yht++xUQKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: rebaseall invocation error
From:	Mirko Vukovic <mirko DOT vukovic AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Faylor  wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote:
>>Problem fixed ... see below
>>
>>On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Faylor
>><email deleted> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote:
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>I am running rebaseall manually to enable X11:  I found a post
>>>>suggesting to rebase to 0x77000000
>>>>
>>>>I am following instructions on http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/Rebaseall
>>>
>>> You realize that the project web site is: http://cygwin.com/ right?  You
>>> can't expect instructions from unrelated sites to work.  You shouldn't
>>> need to use the above anymore with new improvements to reabase.
>>
>>True.  But I did not find anything else better and the instructions on
>>that site jibed with what I read on the cygwin mailing list over the
>>years.  That's why I went with it.
>
> But this wasn't actually "better".  Just running rebaseall, as suggested
> by the official Cygwin FAQ is the correct advice.
>

I agree

> cgf
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -