X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:26:09 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade
Message-ID:	<20120720082609.GW31055@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAMK_jUUS5Pqns_hXZ6Ug3P+tMQ7=xGvZYYUDip_y_zW1iLxiuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5008629D DOT 5090308 AT redhat DOT com> <CAMK_jUWGt-AK8B5LB6JQE710p5GqethEKsQshCHppLo-o0siGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BLU0-SMTP339E12561949F19FA8CC4A0CED90 AT phx DOT gbl> <50086E81 DOT 9000406 AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jul 19 16:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 7/19/2012 4:15 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote:
> >On 19/07/2012 22:00, K Stahl wrote:
> >>>urxvt depends on cygperl5_10.dll, which was removed in the upgrade to
> >>>perl 5.14.  Either urxvt needs to be rebuilt, or the old perl 5.10
> >>>libraries need to be restored for a bit longer.
> >>
> >>Knowing that there are numerous dependencies on the perl upgrade,
> >>could we get someone to update the urxvt package?
> >>
> >
> >I couldn't find any version of urxvt on cygwin's release mirror, so, no
> >packages to start from.
> 
> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=urxvt>
> 
> >Furthermore, for what you are looking for, isn't
> >rxvt pretty much the same?
> >
> >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00078.html
> 
> Pretty much, minus the unicode support and some other niceties mentioned
> in the message you quoted above.  Of course, stepping back to rxvt puts you
> in the realm of dead code.  So if bit-rot is OK with you... ;-)

One word: mintty.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -