X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_RX
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<500878BF.8070507@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:14:39 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade
References:	<CAMK_jUUS5Pqns_hXZ6Ug3P+tMQ7=xGvZYYUDip_y_zW1iLxiuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5008629D DOT 5090308 AT redhat DOT com> <CAMK_jUWGt-AK8B5LB6JQE710p5GqethEKsQshCHppLo-o0siGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BLU0-SMTP339E12561949F19FA8CC4A0CED90 AT phx DOT gbl> <50086E81 DOT 9000406 AT cygwin DOT com> <BLU0-SMTP170955D78AEAA3C3B8B52C6CED90 AT phx DOT gbl>
In-reply-to:	<BLU0-SMTP170955D78AEAA3C3B8B52C6CED90@phx.gbl>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 7/19/2012 4:42 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote:
> On 19/07/2012 22:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 7/19/2012 4:15 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote:
>>> On 19/07/2012 22:00, K Stahl wrote:
>>>
>>> I couldn't find any version of urxvt on cygwin's release mirror, so, no
>>> packages to start from.
>>
>> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=urxvt>
>>
>>> Furthermore, for what you are looking for, isn't
>>> rxvt pretty much the same?
>>>
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00078.html
>>
>> Pretty much, minus the unicode support and some other niceties mentioned
>> in the message you quoted above.  Of course, stepping back to rxvt puts you
>> in the realm of dead code.  So if bit-rot is OK with you... ;-)
>>
>
> It results that the package is named rxvt-unicode-X-9.07-1.tar.bz2 but in
> the end install binaries that are named urxvt:
>
> usr/bin/urxvt-X.exe
> usr/bin/urxvtc-X.exe
> usr/bin/urxvtd-X.exe
>
> and all of them were compiled on Jan 2010. The non unicode is even older, so
> probably everything is broken. I get also the "Bad address" or "unable to
> connect to the rxvt-unicode daemon: No such file or directory" errors.

Yes, as Eric pointed out, these packages would need to be updated or the
old perl libraries would need to be restored to make them work again.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -