X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_RX
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<50086E81.9000406@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:30:57 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cannot Execute urxvt after upgrade
References:	<CAMK_jUUS5Pqns_hXZ6Ug3P+tMQ7=xGvZYYUDip_y_zW1iLxiuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5008629D DOT 5090308 AT redhat DOT com> <CAMK_jUWGt-AK8B5LB6JQE710p5GqethEKsQshCHppLo-o0siGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <BLU0-SMTP339E12561949F19FA8CC4A0CED90 AT phx DOT gbl>
In-reply-to:	<BLU0-SMTP339E12561949F19FA8CC4A0CED90@phx.gbl>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 7/19/2012 4:15 PM, Aaron Schneider wrote:
> On 19/07/2012 22:00, K Stahl wrote:
>>> urxvt depends on cygperl5_10.dll, which was removed in the upgrade to
>>> perl 5.14.  Either urxvt needs to be rebuilt, or the old perl 5.10
>>> libraries need to be restored for a bit longer.
>>
>> Knowing that there are numerous dependencies on the perl upgrade,
>> could we get someone to update the urxvt package?
>>
>
> I couldn't find any version of urxvt on cygwin's release mirror, so, no
> packages to start from.

<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=urxvt>

> Furthermore, for what you are looking for, isn't
> rxvt pretty much the same?
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00078.html

Pretty much, minus the unicode support and some other niceties mentioned
in the message you quoted above.  Of course, stepping back to rxvt puts you
in the realm of dead code.  So if bit-rot is OK with you... ;-)

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -