delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/07/18/04:21:36

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_RCVD_USER,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_JC
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <2f2dd68c3edf1b784e73f66bc51898df.squirrel@zeusw.org>
In-Reply-To: <1342195424.30517.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
References: <1342195424 DOT 30517 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:21:00 +0200
Subject: Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)
From: "Claude SIMON" <simon DOT claude AT zeusw DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: simon DOT claude AT zeusw DOT org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Al Slater wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 16:59, Claude SIMON wrote:
>> Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Sorry, I should have actually looked at the repo before assuming the
>>> test case was a monstrosity. By way of penance, I've now looked,
>>> downloaded, tweaked, and tested it.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
>> I removed your test results (and the other stuff) from this message, not
>> because I'm not interested into, but because I have a new problem, which
>> prevents me to investigate further the original problem in the light of
>> your test results.
>>
>> Since my last testings, I updated Cygwin, the JDK and the JRE. So, my
>> current configuration is now :
>>
>> Windows Vista 32 bits SP2
>> Cygwin 1.7.15
>> g++ 4.5.3
>> javac 1.7.0_05
>> javah 1.7.0_05
>> java 1.7.0_05
>>
>> When running the test case, I now have :
>>
>> $ java jcmc
>> Loading library 'jcmc'...Exception in thread "main"
>> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: H:\cvs\epeios\bugs\jcmc\jcmc.dll:
>> L'accÞs
>> Ó cet emplacement de la mÚmoire n'est pas valide
>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(Unknown Source)
>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
>>          at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
>>          at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
>>          at jcmc.main(jcmc.java:9)
>>
>> There is a French message which roughly means "The access to this memory
>> location is not valid"
>>
>> I updated the test case to reflect your changes :
>> 	- 'Makefile' now generates the '.h' file,
>> 	- 'Makefile' does no more contain the '--stdcall-alias' linker flag,
>> 	- the '.cpp' contains now the `extern "C"' directive,
>> 	- the '.h' is removed from test case, since it's now generated by the
>> 'Makefiile'.
>>
>> I have the new error message with this modified test case, but also with
>> the original one. I suspect that the French error message is issued by
>> Cygwin or by one of its sub-component, since the JVM never issued a
>> message which wasn't in English, but Cygwin did.
>>
>> So, I have to postpone the study of the 'malloc()' related bug until I
>> manage to resolve this new issue ; I then come back to your test
>> results.
>> But, meanwhile, if someone has an idea why I have this new error...
>>
>> Here again the address where the test case can be found :
>> 	http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/epeios/bugs/jcmc/?root=epeios
>>
>
> Does
> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.programming.html#faq.programming.msvs-mingw
> provide any help?
>

Not really, but thanks for your suggestion.

My Java native components are usually compiled under Visual C++. As I
provide them as Free Software, I would like to provide a way to compile
this components without having to use a proprietary compiler. This is why
I went for 'Cygwin', but 'Cygwin', and especially the 'Cygwin' DLL, isn't
required for my components to work.

--
Claude SIMON
http://zeusw.org/


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019