X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120712161421.GC3406@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<CAHiT=DEgVMRvLZ2J64FEdhXRBe6VYR0fypsWpk8_aj0bHYsWGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGvSfex6-P9PB6UJ56EPRMCjQUqKmgv=NygwXy1Jzq0r3C-o=g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAHiT=DHsH_sZ9MPyc7o=t2m_Xb_XnD6KLXeMZ686oa3_-yYQCw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C969B6CE944F4D9CBEE35FC1BFBFE14E AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <87mx36z0yo DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <7FA8477365204CA6B4617E7279967C24 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <87a9z6ywvp DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <60B4845A414A4F228982AB4DEAF4D4FE AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <87pq81d09k DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <CAHiT=DHYGL6ycTxMtKdWZUJ5tL_unQBNWognZ7HAVu6eTK21_w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120712161421 DOT GC3406 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:50:19 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAHiT=DF-6EgktC+60Te_9+25h71M9QqPWXpTeies8ebGcxqZoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: perl-5.14.2 switch
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 12 10:24, Reini Urban wrote:
>> Well, I'm not so happy with threads. They seem to be more broken than with 5.10.
>> But I like 5.14.2 generally at most of all also, much better than the
>> completely flawed 5.16.
>
> Is this thread problem something Cygwin-specific, a Cygwin bug perhaps?
> If so, can you nail that down into a simple C testcase?

The failing thread tests in perls testsuite are unfortunately not so simple.
Mostly torture tests.
google's threadsanitizer might come handy.
I found a lot of perl bugs with the related addresssanitizer.

I'm pretty sure it's perls fault here, because mingw has the same problems.
And the were some subtle changes between 5.10 and 5.14. I tried to improve
it with a patch, but it didn't help much.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://cpanel.net/   http://www.perl-compiler.org/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -