X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_RCVD_USER,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_JC
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4bfae5cb28706b33d48372d5a1bd80bb.squirrel@zeusw.org>
In-Reply-To:	<1342107001.13284.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
References:	<1342107001 DOT 13284 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:59:58 +0200
Subject:	Re: Differences between C++ 'new' operator and 'malloc()' (NOT a C/C++ question)
From:	"Claude SIMON" <simon DOT claude AT zeusw DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	simon DOT claude AT zeusw DOT org
User-Agent:	SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Ryan Johnson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Sorry, I should have actually looked at the repo before assuming the
> test case was a monstrosity. By way of penance, I've now looked,
> downloaded, tweaked, and tested it.
>
> [...]
>

Thanks for testing.

I removed your test results (and the other stuff) from this message, not
because I'm not interested into, but because I have a new problem, which
prevents me to investigate further the original problem in the light of
your test results.

Since my last testings, I updated Cygwin, the JDK and the JRE. So, my
current configuration is now :

Windows Vista 32 bits SP2
Cygwin 1.7.15
g++ 4.5.3
javac 1.7.0_05
javah 1.7.0_05
java 1.7.0_05

When running the test case, I now have :

$ java jcmc
Loading library 'jcmc'...Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: H:\cvs\epeios\bugs\jcmc\jcmc.dll: L'accÞs
Ó cet emplacement de la mÚmoire n'est pas valide
        at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
        at jcmc.main(jcmc.java:9)

There is a French message which roughly means "The access to this memory
location is not valid"

I updated the test case to reflect your changes :
	- 'Makefile' now generates the '.h' file,
	- 'Makefile' does no more contain the '--stdcall-alias' linker flag,
	- the '.cpp' contains now the `extern "C"' directive,
	- the '.h' is removed from test case, since it's now generated by the
'Makefiile'.

I have the new error message with this modified test case, but also with
the original one. I suspect that the French error message is issued by
Cygwin or by one of its sub-component, since the JVM never issued a
message which wasn't in English, but Cygwin did.

So, I have to postpone the study of the 'malloc()' related bug until I
manage to resolve this new issue ; I then come back to your test results.
But, meanwhile, if someone has an idea why I have this new error...

Here again the address where the test case can be found :
	http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/epeios/bugs/jcmc/?root=epeios

-- 
Claude SIMON (sc DOT cygwin DOT com AT zeusw DOT org)


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -