X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_CV,TW_XV
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Spam-Processed:	mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:17:05 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP:	188.220.16.49
X-Return-Path:	prvs=15408cd04b=killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk
X-Envelope-From:	killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<447894CEE2E7427F8E0AFC5A206BAD92@multiplay.co.uk>
From:	"Steven Hartland" <killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<BLU152-W148807FCA9B75410CB8F1FCED10 AT phx DOT gbl> <92B65842B4224F3FA65CE40F3608F7DF AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <20120712010353 DOT GB14112 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject:	Re: tar won't extract all files when a file with exe extension precedes the same without extension inside the archive
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:16:53 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Faylor"


> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 01:39:41AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>From: "Aaron Schneider"
>>> $ touch myfile myfile.exe
>>>
>>> $ tar -cvf mytar.tar myfile.exe myfile
>>>
>>> $ tar -xvf mytar.tar
>>>
>>> Only myfile will be written to the filesystem
>>
>>Yep, apparently its "by design" :(
>>
>>It causes us pain regularly so we would like this fairly
>>recent change reverted so behaviour is once again predicatable
>>and it doesnt break simple takess like extracting archive.
> 
> Yes, yes.  The pain.  The pain.  Danger Will Robinson!
> 
> There really is not much point in rehashing this again under a different
> subject.
> 
> If you or anyone would like to offer patches which change the behavior
> while keeping everyone happy about .exe handling please do so.

Isn't the commit which changed the behaviour stored so where,
as this has worked fine in the past, so in theory it could be
just applied in reverse?

    Regards
    Steve


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -