X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4FEC8064.4060700@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:03:48 +0100
From:	Richard H Lee <ricardohenrylee AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	POSIX or SYSV IPC calls on cygwin
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I'm looking to use IPC calls on cygwin (shared memory and semaphores). 
The posix IPC api looks saner (easier), but it looks like it was only 
brought in in cygwin 1.7 .

Am I better sticking to the SYSV IPC api? Or is the POSIX IPC api stable 
enough to use?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -