X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:16:36 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Trusted Software Vendor
Message-ID:	<20120619071636.GB5825@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A20A770AB443 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <1591225778 DOT 20120611180232 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <4FD6045E DOT 6020000 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <20120611144627 DOT GB4004 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4FD605DB DOT 9080606 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <20120611145532 DOT GD4004 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAKw7uVgfEUtUvKnKMt8igc12fSgTnRf_w80Y1HDJNWte26XjQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1304505710 DOT 20120614224515 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20120618145140 DOT GC26243 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <24174272 DOT 20120619042525 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<24174272.20120619042525@mtu-net.ru>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jun 19 04:25, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
> 
> >> >>>> Out of curiosity would downloading setup.exe using wget also work
> >> >>>>around the problem?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Most likely.  I don't think wget cares about protecting Windows users
> >> >>>from their own stupidity.  If you use wget, you should know what you're
> >> >>>doing.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>How about you just give it a try?
> >> >>
> >> >> Er, I don't have this problem.  I wasn't the one reporting it.
> >> > Downloading setup.exe with wget has another problem. The downloaded
> >> > file is missing the +x bit, IIRC.
> >> 
> >> It's irrelevant for setup.exe.
> 
> > It's not.  Try to start any executable on a NTFS filesystem.  Remove
> > the executable bits from all entries in the ACL.  Try again.
> 
> Sure that will cause issues, but read quote from the start.
> If you download setup.exe using wget, it's unlikely you'll be unable to run
> it.
> You need to do some real tinkering first to prevent that.

I was solely referring to the common misconception that the execute bit
has no meaning for Windows excecutables.  Some people even think the
execute bit is just faked by Cygwin(*).  I can't let this go without
commenting on it.


Corinna


(*) which it is, but only on filesystems which don't support permissions
    at all, like FAT/FAT32.

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -