X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"James Johnston" <JamesJ AT motionview3d DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAH3PqnIBVHtCiVMVjN0ExZLigAAAEAAAAJXIkaLIcH5Pn+g+gRSa2KoBAAAAAA==@expertise.cl> <20120608184641 DOT GA13771 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4FD32DC5 DOT 10703 AT gmail DOT com> <20120609155700 DOT GA21988 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4FD73CC9 DOT 3070501 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20120612131608 DOT GA18920 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20120612131608.GA18920@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Subject:	RE: Trusted Software Vendor
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:46:44 -0000
Message-ID:	<00ab01cd48aa$31047bb0$930d7310$@motionview3d.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> >Red Hat might not have to buy a code signing cert for this.  They might
> >already have one that will work: http://goo.gl/5Hm3C
> 
> The Cygwin project is not Red Hat.  It wouldn't be "Red Hat" buying
anything.

What is the Cygwin project then?  I honestly thought it was a Red Hat
project...  I.e. I've thought of it as a "Linux" distribution from Red Hat,
with Corinna Vinschen being a senior Red Hat engineer, according to your
FAQ.  Wikipedia says that you yourself used to work for Red Hat.  Bottom of
Cygwin.com:

"The Cygwin DLL and utilities are Copyright C <snip> 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
Other packages have other copyrights."

Also Wikipedia says that the project was started by Cygnus Solutions which
was then merged with Red Hat back in 2000.  It is logical to assume that if
the copyright is owned by Red Hat and some contributor(s) are Red Hat
employees, then the Cygwin project would have some level of access to Red
Hat resources.  If Cygwin isn't owned/run by Red Hat as you seem to
indicate, why do they seem to have their fingers in everything?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -