delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/06/11/10:43:22

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/i6N2ybDqS1+vxiRPptnYl
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:42:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: make: .exe handling breaks kernel cross-compile
Message-ID: <20120611144252.GA4004@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4FD4E21A DOT 2080809 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20120610182927 DOT GB32575 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4FD50A3D DOT 9040201 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20120611042637 DOT GB590 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4FD58A66 DOT 5060000 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4FD58A66.5060000@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:04:22AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>
>On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo.  It's
>> undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency.
>>
>> I'm not kidding about EXEEXT.  Surely you know about this from having
>> maintained cygport.
>
>Am I ever, but I suspect *you* know that incorporating EXEEXT into the 
>Linux kernel buildsystem will likely never be accepted upstream.

>>On 2012-06-10 14:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>Makefiles which expect .exe extensions usually use the EXEEXT variable
>>>for just this purpose.  Linux's makefile doesn't do that for probably
>>>obvious reasons.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019