X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,BOTNET,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4FD163EC.9070008@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:31:08 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pipe error depending on drive
References:	<8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E6095B672749 AT server03 DOT company DOT internal>
In-reply-to:	<8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E6095B672749@server03.company.internal>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6/7/2012 10:30 AM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a strange behavior of cygwin here. I have two machines with the
> nearly (*)he same configuration on machine A everything works good, on B I
> get the error
>
> 1 [main] sh 1884 sig_send: error sending signal -40 to pid 1884, pipe
>handle 0x768, Win32 error 6
> sh: fork: retry: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> depending on which drive I start a perl program which uses a pipe via
> IO::File->new("dosomething.pl |");

<http://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures>

<snip>

> Two other issues are also strange  :
>
> First if I try to update machine A I get the warning that this is the
> first time that I setup version 1.7 (setup 2.774)

More than 1 installation on this machine?  Check 'cygcheck -srv' output.

> Second the /etc/fstab file seems to have no effect on the mountings on machine B
> Even if I delete this file I get the same settings

'/etc/fstab' is "additive".  Put additional mount points in this file.  The
ones you have are the defaults so they are not driven by this file.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -