X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Pach Roman (DGS-EC/ESG2)" <Roman DOT Pach AT de DOT bosch DOT com>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:29:29 +0200
Subject:	Re: Performance problems with emacs-X11 in current cygwin
Message-ID:	<AF5E26A9B961BF4681B5C1593D7D03C020AFDD71F6@SI-MBX06.de.bosch.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q556Tx5m031072

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:49:07 -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
| | |    The emacs is not the only application, which is very slow now.
| | |    Take a look at gvim.
| | |
| | |
| | |    For my purpose I have not installed the changes to GNOME and work
| | |    still with the old versions.
| | |    With the following packages everything is running as fast as earlier
| | |
| | |
| | |        release/GNOME/GConf2/GConf2-3.2.5-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/GConf2/libgconf2_4/libgconf2_4-3.2.5-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/atk1.0/libatk1.0-devel/libatk1.0-devel-2.4.0-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/atk1.0/libatk1.0_0/libatk1.0_0-2.4.0-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/font-cantarell-otf/font-cantarell-otf-0.0.8-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf2.0/libgdk_pixbuf2.0-devel/libgdk_pixbuf2.0-devel-2.26.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gdk-pixbuf2.0/libgdk_pixbuf2.0_0/libgdk_pixbuf2.0_0-2.26.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/glib2.0/libglib2.0-devel/libglib2.0-devel-2.32.2-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/glib2.0/libglib2.0_0/libglib2.0_0-2.32.2-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gnome-common/gnome-common-3.4.0.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gnome-icon-theme/gnome-icon-theme-3.4.0-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.4.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gtk2.0/gtk2.0-demo/gtk2.0-demo-2.24.10-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gtk2.0/gtk2.0-gail/gtk2.0-gail-2.24.10-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gtk2.0/libgailutil18/libgailutil18-2.24.10-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gtk2.0/libgtk2.0-devel/libgtk2.0-devel-2.24.10-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/gtk2.0/libgtk2.0_0/libgtk2.0_0-2.24.10-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/libcroco0.6/libcroco0.6_3/libcroco0.6_3-0.6.5-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/libgnome2/gconf-desktop-schemas/gconf-desktop-schemas-2.32.1-2.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/libgsf/libgsf1_114/libgsf1_114-1.14.23-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/librsvg2/librsvg2_2/librsvg2_2-2.36.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/librsvg2/rsvg/rsvg-2.36.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/pango1.0/libpango1.0-devel/libpango1.0-devel-1.30.0-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/pango1.0/libpango1.0_0/libpango1.0_0-1.30.0-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/yelp-tools/yelp-tools-3.4.1-1.tar.bz2
| | |        release/GNOME/yelp-xsl/yelp-xsl-3.4.1-1.tar.bz2
| | Is this on XP? I ask because I'm having trouble reverting my XP system back to a state
| | where there's no problem. So at this point I'm thoroughly confused.
| | But I may have to recheck that I've really reverted all the GNOME components.
| |
| | Ken
|
|
|    Hello Ken,
|
|    Yes it's XP.
|    To get the all working state I've taken the
|       cygwin-1.7.14-2, setup-timestamp: 1336974063
|    and merged by hand the changes from
|       setup-timestamp: 1336974063, with the exception of GNOME packages
|    The result is the attached setup.ini
|
|
| Thanks, Roman. But please keep the discussion on the mailing list,
| so that others can benefit from it.
| I'm including your attachment in this reply.
|
| The attached file is not consistent with the list of packages that you gave above.
| The versions in your list are newer than those in the attachment. That's why I was
| confused by your email. If I assume that the attachment represents what you really have installed,
| then your observations are consistent with the ones I made in
|
| http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-06/msg00043.html
|
| Can you confirm this?
|
| Ken

Hi Ken,

yes, you are right.
It seems I copied by mistake the false list of files (i.e. the new ones).
One should use the package versions from the mentioned setup.ini

(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-06/msg00057/setup.bz2)

to get the emacs and gvim running normally on XP again.

Roman

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -