delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/06/01/13:46:42

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:46:10 -0500
From: "Ryan C. Underwood" <nemesis-lists AT icequake DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: How to "bisect" Cygwin?
Message-ID: <20120601174610.GD25227@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: nemesis AT icequake DOT net
References: <20120531210143 DOT GA11744 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120531210143.GA11744@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
>=20
> How can I "bisect" Cygwin i.e. by setting a certain date at which to
> install packages that were current as of that date, and checking if
> problem remains, so as to track down the date a problem/different
> behavior was introduced sometime in the past year?  Actually, if I
> could start with the Cygwin DLLs themselves, that would probably get
> me to the bottom of it.

I located the problem, it came in between the Time Machine 2012/02/04
and 2012/02/05 archives.  Unfortunately, this looks like a major
release for Cygwin happened on that day:

good:
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 MYPC 1.7.9(0.237/5/3) 2011-03-29 10:10 i686 Cygwin
bad:
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 MYPC 1.7.10(0.259/5/3) 2012-02-05 12:36 i686 Cygwin

I tried diffing the CVS by tags but it doesn't look like 1.7.9 was
tagged, or else the tags were removed as obsolete.  Any suggestions as
to the best way to dig into the differences here?

--=20
Ryan C. Underwood, <nemesis AT icequake DOT net>

--llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFPyP/iIonHnh+67jkRAq8NAKClwqH1nhr1yaeSTFCroIG23Rc7sgCcD6iA
YCX3ISPrEhU55jxnNFNKMXM=
=5JAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019