Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/05/25/11:27:53
On May 25 16:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 25 15:18, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:54:14PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >> On May 25 14:17, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> > >> > 97 6945 [main] date 3440 pinfo::thisproc: myself dwProcessId 3440
> > >> > 76 7021 [main] date 3440 time: 1337945628 = time(0)
> > >> > --- Process 3440, exception C0000005 at 610DDC3C
> > >> > 1343 8364 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In cygwin_except_handler exception 0xC0000005 at 0x610DDC3C sp 0x2127F0
> > >> > 92 8456 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In cygwin_except_handler signal 11 at 0x610DDC3C
> > >> > 86 8542 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In cygwin_except_handler calling 0x0
> > >> > 320 8862 [main] date 3440 D:\Home\dexcoff1\dexcoff1\cyg12e\bin\date.exe: *** fatal error - internal error reading the windows environment - too many environment variables?
> > >>
> > >> Grr. The fault handler covers the actual problem. I'm going to send
> > >> you the URL to a test DLL in a minute via PM, if you don't mind. It has
> > >> the fault handler removed, so instead of the "internal error reading the
> > >> windows environment" error you should see a "real" SEGV, and the crash
> > >> should hopefully produce a more valid stacktrace. That's what I'd be
> > >> interested in.
> >
> > Here are the results:
> >
> > % /usr/bin/strace -o date.trace2 /usr/bin/date
> > 8972 [main] date 716 exception::handle: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
> > 10607 [main] date 716 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to date.exe.stackdump
> > % cat date.exe.stackdump
> > Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=610E4BB1
> > eax=000E000C ebx=611FDA9A ecx=00000020 edx=0022AAC4 esi=60FD0000 edi=61006582
> > ebp=00212978 esp=002128F0 program=D:\Home\dexcoff1\dexcoff1\cyg12e\bin\date.exe, pid 716, thread main
> > cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003B gs=0000 ss=0023
> > Stack trace:
> > Frame Function Args
> > 00212978 610E4BB1 (00222A91, 611F7FCF, 0022AAC4, 002229F0)
> > 00222A28 610E9092 (611AEA40, 00222A50, 611F8280, 611F7FB8)
> > 0022AA68 610E9270 (611AEA40, 00000040, 611F8280, 611F7FB8)
> > 0022AAA8 610E9421 (611AEA40, 00000040, 611F8280, 611F7FB8)
> > 0022AB08 610C7090 (0022ABE0, 0000074C, 00020019, 0022AB54)
> > 0022AB38 610C6E5A (0022ABE0, 0000074C, 00020019, 611F7FA6)
>
> Bzz. Thank you. One of the debug output statements was broken.
> A struct was given to the debug_printf function by value, but the
> function expects a pointer. Should be fixed now in CVS.
I just uploaded a new snapshot.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -