X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 19:18:34 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.7.15-1: pthread_cancel and pthread_kill not working as expected
Message-ID:	<20120523171834.GM9200@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4FAAAE25 DOT 40204 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <4FB62304 DOT 2000100 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <CA+sc5mkqAoFoO=Jh19WMFe7FDq0337nz5r3-o6ogvGMvt3qPYw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4FBA1846 DOT 6020005 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <20120521104717 DOT GC7763 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBA38A5 DOT 5030408 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <20120522110238 DOT GC15843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4FBB93D6 DOT 90408 AT sister-shadow DOT de> <20120523085215 DOT GG9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120523160625 DOT GL9200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20120523160625.GL9200@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On May 23 18:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 23 10:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On May 22 15:25, Otto Meta wrote:
> > > >> Testcase cancel deferred:
> > > >> Works with 1.7.9 and 20120517 snapshot, fails (hangs) with 1.7.12-1
> > > >> and 1.7.15-1.
> > > > If that works in the snapshot anyway, I'm not going to look into that
> > > > one.
> > > 
> > > It worked in the reduced testcase with sem_wait(). With read() it’s
> > > still half-broken. See below.
> > > 
> > > >> Testcase cancel asynchronous:
> > > >> Async cancel seems to have no effect with any tested version.
> > > > I think I found a solution for this problem.  See the comment in the
> > > > patch at
> > > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.258&r2=1.259
> > > > Please test the today's developer snapshot.
> > > 
> > > Asynchronous cancel seems to work as well as deferred cancel now. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Both cancel types work with sem_wait() and pause() now, but for threads
> > > blocked in read() they’re still unreliable. Only one of three blocked
> > > threads is killed in the attached updated testcases.
> > 
> > Just to let you know I'm working on it.  This will take some time.
> > During debugging I stumbled over a heisenbug.  As soon as I remove the
> > "Thread %i woke up just fine" printf from your test application, the
> > read function reurns with a "Bad address" error.  So far I have onlya
> > vague hunch what the cause may be.  Stay tuned.
> 
> Half of the solution is now checked in to CVS.  The other half is a bad
> hack to workaround a shortcoming in newlib's stdio functions.  I'd rather
> have a solution in newlib.  see my request on the newlib ML:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/newlib/2012/msg00188.html

Ok, for the time being I checked in my workaround.  Please test the
today's developer snapshot.


THanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -