X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler:	MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX19NKlqchUuaqigiBklwqRbi
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23:20 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [feature] alias "more" to "less"
Message-ID:	<20120517232320.GB21519@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4FACCED0 DOT 709 AT gmail DOT com> <jottbc$955$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20120515172812 DOT GB12873 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <jou577$dfo$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20120515195347 DOT GB14665 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <jouqhc$gat$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <jp40pe$t19$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<jp40pe$t19$1@dough.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:13:32PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>On 5/15/2012 4:57 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> On 5/15/2012 12:53 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> Ok, fair enough. We're also not going to add an alias for more to 
>>> every single shipping shell. As was mentioned in the first response 
>>> to the original post there is actually a more in util-linux package. 
>>> That should be reason enough not to add a simple alias/symlink.
>> I guess that's also fair enough...
>Went to update my Cygwin archive and decided to include more in my local 
>package dir. So I search for it and I find nothing but xmore. I tried 
>looking in Utils and couldn't find anything about util-linux or even 
>linux. Went cygwin.com and Search Packages. Looked for more. I don't 
>find any package that has it. I do see things about less.
>
>OK so where's more hiding?

Wow.  We're still talking about this?  It really isn't that hard.

Just type "util-linux" in the search box for setup.exe.

If you're looking for the package which holds more.exe then search for
more.exe in the package search.  You'll then find util-linux.

There are enough packages in the distro which include the word "more"
that you won't find util-linux in the first thirty matches.  It is on
the main search page though if you scroll down.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -