X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4FB40CF7.207@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 May 2012 22:24:23 +0200
From:	marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1
References:	<announce DOT 4F4CEC83 DOT 8050605 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4f6Cn_V6=TGGm1QTKL=H2S7vQ=7PSyV01WaKV=AvScZsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4FB3FDBE DOT 5000206 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4cBRPD56Dr6X=iUv8kARXeKLztAErQB=dj9sDNOMcmtJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4FB40AE1 DOT 2060101 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4FB40AE1.2060101@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/16/2012 10:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> On 16 May 2012 15:19, marco atzeri wrote:
>>> On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>>> Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address'
>>>> error:
>>>>
>>>> $ gpg --version
>>>> mksh: gpg: Bad address
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> $ cygcheck gpg
>>
>> Ah, should have thought of that. Turns out the culprit was a missing
>> dependency on libreadline6 (I believe as part of zlib).
>
> It isn't zlib (no binaries) or even zlib0 (cygcheck /usr/bin/cygz.dll
> doesn't show libreadline 6 or 7).
>
> Why are we still linking against libreadline6 instead of libreadline7?
> Is there a hint file that needs modification to fix the missing
> dependency while we work on the bigger issue of getting the outdated
> package built against a newer readline library?
>

gpg depends on libreadline7

I see no other readline dependency

Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -