delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/05/16/16:16:09

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4FB40AE1.2060101@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:15:29 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gnupg-1.4.12-1
References: <announce DOT 4F4CEC83 DOT 8050605 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4f6Cn_V6=TGGm1QTKL=H2S7vQ=7PSyV01WaKV=AvScZsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4FB3FDBE DOT 5000206 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGHJv4cBRPD56Dr6X=iUv8kARXeKLztAErQB=dj9sDNOMcmtJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGHJv4cBRPD56Dr6X=iUv8kARXeKLztAErQB=dj9sDNOMcmtJA@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--------------enigD9A09D5D82E93C1FA6CC2E4C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05/16/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 16 May 2012 15:19, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On 5/16/2012 9:12 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> Every command / option I try with gpg comes back with a 'Bad address'
>>> error:
>>>
>>> $ gpg --version
>>> mksh: gpg: Bad address
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> $ cygcheck gpg
>=20
> Ah, should have thought of that. Turns out the culprit was a missing
> dependency on libreadline6 (I believe as part of zlib).

It isn't zlib (no binaries) or even zlib0 (cygcheck /usr/bin/cygz.dll
doesn't show libreadline 6 or 7).

Why are we still linking against libreadline6 instead of libreadline7?
Is there a hint file that needs modification to fix the missing
dependency while we work on the bigger issue of getting the outdated
package built against a newer readline library?

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake AT redhat DOT com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--------------enigD9A09D5D82E93C1FA6CC2E4C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPtArhAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqFYUH/iUnLvpPq9dqNxhC5Eq13pwj
aUW8KaQ1QY+2qc+pl16aeNMQ/ER3HYqX8R/EnM0awpuGrn+bKz/tJ7VvB0gsEhnP
YQhRNFoV0QoKt3AItKxw+r9V52k4QxQWAR3mDOMo8BjW4FxBfCEzjTOrFpAMAsCC
scvK3dyoHwyo1q9QvPbV1qnb9l5hZCD3au/hYR+d2Vlo+IQ2mdpyEPEBjy5zobqx
HvpM9rsoZIN8dIrSxtOBmxJ0G2faxORV87mEwF5l8iKWoCa8cV1P7+fV9O/a0PSH
NK5CiFuvKaXlm+GsgDzu5jPo79BKfwj2tYkxoWycUZHBsFxRYpz4EgvJYSfO0T4=
=PD6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigD9A09D5D82E93C1FA6CC2E4C--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019