X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Mail-Handler:	MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX19FHviJrWxQio06XNFXscYh
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:50:29 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Using Red Hat digital signing on setup.exe (was Re: Cygwin 1.7.14-2 setup.exe v2.772 broken?)
Message-ID:	<20120428205029.GB20709@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4F9B1EF7 DOT 1080501 AT comcast DOT net> <4F9B6DC1 DOT 3030303 AT gmail DOT com> <4F9B77B1 DOT 9070200 AT gmail DOT com> <4F9C22B1 DOT 5000405 AT comcast DOT net> <20120428180621 DOT GA23030 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CADSoG1tUY2BXCsU2UcnrgFPAg9KXFn2N5J4zcoi_MVJUQwb0Aw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CADSoG1tUY2BXCsU2UcnrgFPAg9KXFn2N5J4zcoi_MVJUQwb0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:22:29PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
>Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the
>installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?

setup.exe is not produced by Red Hat and the Cygwin project at
cygwin.com is not a Red Hat project.  So, the logicstics of doing this
aside, I doubt that Red Hat would be too keen on the idea.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -