X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F96E00B.7000401@wanadoo.fr>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:16:59 +0200
From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Bouat?= <jerome DOT bouat AT wanadoo DOT fr>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: lzma instead of bzip2 for packages compression ?
References:	<4F96D2FD DOT 1040907 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <4F96D45D DOT 70204 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4F96D45D.70204@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

In case you want to use xz, the '--extreme' option prevides a higher compression ratio than lzma with the same memory requirement for decompression.

Le 24/04/2012 18:27, Eric Blake a écrit :
> On 04/24/2012 10:21 AM, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> The cygwin 'tar.bz2' packages are created once and broadcasted to many
>> hosts.
>>
>> The lzma compression is fast for decompression.  Could we possibly get
>> the packages with lzma compression ?
>
> lzma is obsolete.  If anything, we want xz.
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -