| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_NEUTRAL,TW_NW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <4F89C67B.30905@cornell.edu> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:48:27 -0400 |
| From: | Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: gcc: turning off large-address awareness |
| References: | <4F896504 DOT 3030006 AT cornell DOT edu> <CA+sc5mnBXZ_+R9OKUX2idT_TBxE82U4ZfbOkcuWZgn9Y6TGxeA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4F89B215 DOT 9050903 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120414173342 DOT GD15801 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
| In-Reply-To: | <20120414173342.GD15801@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
| X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: | Pawpaw |
| X-Original-Sender: | kbrown AT cornell DOT edu - Sat Apr 14 14:48:34 2012 |
| X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: | CU_White_List_Override |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 4/14/2012 1:33 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:21:25PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 4/14/2012 12:37 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>> For testing purposes, I'd like to build without large-address awareness.
>>>> What's the right way to do that? I tried
>>>>
>>>> LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-large-address-aware
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> LDFLAGS=-Wl,--disable-large-address-aware
>>>>
>>>> but both resulted in "unrecognized option" errors from ld.
>>>
>>> You specify --large-address-aware if you want it and don't specify if
>>> you don't want it.
>>
>> Sorry, I should have explained more clearly what the issue is. Cygwin's
>> gcc specifies --large-address-aware by default:
>>
>> $ gcc -dumpspecs | grep large
>> %{mwindows:--subsystem windows} %{mconsole:--subsystem console}
>> %{!mno-cygwin:%{!mno-use-libstdc-wrappers: --wrap _Znwj --wrap _Znaj
>> --wrap _ZdlPv --wrap _ZdaPv --wrap _ZnwjRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap
>> _ZnajRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap _ZdlPvRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap
>> _ZdaPvRKSt9nothrow_t }} %{shared: %{mdll: %eshared and mdll are not
>> compatible}} %{shared: --shared} %{mdll:--dll} %{static:-Bstatic}
>> %{!static:-Bdynamic} %{shared|mdll: --enable-auto-image-base -e
>> %{mno-cygwin:_DllMainCRTStartup AT 12}
>> %{!mno-cygwin:__cygwin_dll_entry AT 12}}
>> %{!mno-cygwin:--dll-search-prefix=cyg %{!shared: %{!mdll:
>> --large-address-aware --tsaware}}}
>>
>> I'm trying to override this default.
>
> You're right that there isn't a way to disable --large-address-aware
> but, since it's part of the specs, I'm not sure what would take
> precedence if there was a --disable* option.
>
> You could try using the above to create your own spec file and use
> that on the command line for gcc, cumbersome as it is.
That works, thanks. I didn't know about spec files.
Ken
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |