delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_NW |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Mail-Handler: | MailHop Outbound by DynDNS |
X-Report-Abuse-To: | abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) |
X-MHO-User: | U2FsdGVkX1/wu1LRqfXV3O7DtGB+JZJ9 |
Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:33:42 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: gcc: turning off large-address awareness |
Message-ID: | <20120414173342.GD15801@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4F896504 DOT 3030006 AT cornell DOT edu> <CA+sc5mnBXZ_+R9OKUX2idT_TBxE82U4ZfbOkcuWZgn9Y6TGxeA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4F89B215 DOT 9050903 AT cornell DOT edu> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4F89B215.9050903@cornell.edu> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:21:25PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >On 4/14/2012 12:37 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >>> For testing purposes, I'd like to build without large-address awareness. >>> What's the right way to do that? I tried >>> >>> LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-large-address-aware >>> >>> and >>> >>> LDFLAGS=-Wl,--disable-large-address-aware >>> >>> but both resulted in "unrecognized option" errors from ld. >> >> You specify --large-address-aware if you want it and don't specify if >> you don't want it. > >Sorry, I should have explained more clearly what the issue is. Cygwin's >gcc specifies --large-address-aware by default: > >$ gcc -dumpspecs | grep large > %{mwindows:--subsystem windows} %{mconsole:--subsystem console} >%{!mno-cygwin:%{!mno-use-libstdc-wrappers: --wrap _Znwj --wrap _Znaj > --wrap _ZdlPv --wrap _ZdaPv --wrap _ZnwjRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap >_ZnajRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap _ZdlPvRKSt9nothrow_t --wrap >_ZdaPvRKSt9nothrow_t }} %{shared: %{mdll: %eshared and mdll are not >compatible}} %{shared: --shared} %{mdll:--dll} %{static:-Bstatic} >%{!static:-Bdynamic} %{shared|mdll: --enable-auto-image-base -e >%{mno-cygwin:_DllMainCRTStartup AT 12} >%{!mno-cygwin:__cygwin_dll_entry AT 12}} >%{!mno-cygwin:--dll-search-prefix=cyg %{!shared: %{!mdll: >--large-address-aware --tsaware}}} > >I'm trying to override this default. You're right that there isn't a way to disable --large-address-aware but, since it's part of the specs, I'm not sure what would take precedence if there was a --disable* option. You could try using the above to create your own spec file and use that on the command line for gcc, cumbersome as it is. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |