X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F724CD6.8020600@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:27:18 +0800
From:	JonY <jon_y AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rebase-4.1.0-1
References:	<announce DOT 20120327014025 DOT GA3344 AT tishler DOT net> <4F712CFC DOT 9050603 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20120327083621 DOT GA30721 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20120327083621.GA30721@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/27/2012 16:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 26 22:59, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> On 26/03/2012 9:40 PM, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>> New News:
>>> =3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D
>>> I have updated the version of rebase to 4.1.0-1.  The tarballs should be
>>> available on a Cygwin mirror near you shortly.
>>>
>>> The following are the changes since the previous release:
>>>
>>>     * Add rebase/rebaseall touch file (i.e., -t option) support.
>>>
>>>     * Add rebaseall setup (i.e., -p option) support.
>>>
>>>     * Add .oct to the default rebaseall suffix list.
>> I've been meaning to ask... but maybe the above-mentioned -p flag
>> obsoletes it now: What's the most efficient way to rebase after
>> running setup? We've had the rebase db for a while now, so running
>> rebaseall seems like overkill. Only the newly downloaded dlls need
>=20
> Now that the new rebase is out, I'm going to create an _autorebase
> package which will automatically call rebaseall at the end of a
> successful run of setup, if that run also updated existing DLLs or
> came with new DLLs.

If I don't want it to run? I've never had any need to rebase DLLs on my
Win7 64bit machine.


--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9yTPcACgkQp56AKe10wHdPjQCeKJiaZGttYLt0fe1MMwiFywGt
Mc4AnjpGWe76lmmUAN8yzxAmRF+apsBO
=F5At
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig1FB0D606FE2D492A5CF492B9--

- Raw text -