Mail Archives: cygwin/2012/03/26/13:01:50
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 22 18:47, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> clock_getres already returns the coarsest time. Did you mean the
>>> setting in hires_ms::resolution, by any chance? It's using the
>>> actual setting right now.
>> No. Yes.
>>
>> No, clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME, .) returns gtod.resolution() which
>> calls hires_ms::resolution().
>>
>> Yes, I mean this function which returns the 'actual' value from
>> NtQueryTimerResolution(:-).
>>
>>
>>>> If clock_setres() is used, this setting should be returned instead
>>>> of the 'actual' value at the time of the setting.
>>> Well, I'm not overly concerned about clock_setres, given that it's
>>> probably not used at all :)
>> Yes, it is not POSIX and does not exist on Linux, FreeBSD, ...
>>
>> It IMO is useful as CLOCK_REALTIME does only provide a rather coarse
>> default resolution on Cygwin.
> I see your point, but what bugs me a bit is the fact that
> clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME) and clock_setres(CLOCK_REALTIME) will
> always return the same value coarsest, regardless what value has been set.
If clock_setres was called and succeeded, then clock_getres(.) should
return the value set before.
If clock_setres was not called, the coarsest value is IMO the only value
that can be guaranteed.
The actual value returned by NtQueryTimerResolution is simply useless in
this context: It is the minimum of all resolutions currently set by all
running processes. It may change at any time. There is apparently no way
the query the current setting of the current process.
clock_gettime is part of the POSIX realtime extensions. On Linux it
requires -lrt which implies -lpthreads. So if clock_gettime is used we
can probably assume that the program wants a finer resolution.
This leads to a possible alternative if clock_setres is not used: On
first call of clock_gettime/getres set a finer (the finest?) resolution
and return this with clock_getres.
Drawback: The finer resolution will persist until this process and all
childs terminate. This may have unknown impact on performance, power
management or whatever.
This could be fixed by resetting the resolution to default if
clock_gettime is no longer used for some time (e.g. >= 10min).
Drawback: Even more complexity :-)
> I added this comment to clock_setres at one point:
>
> /* Convert to 100ns to match OS resolution. The OS uses ULONG values
> to express resolution in 100ns units, so the coarsest timer resolution
> is< 430 secs. Actually the coarsest timer resolution is only slightly
> beyond 15ms, but this might change in future OS versions, so we play nice
> here. */
>
> So, what if the OS really returns bigger values in coarsest at one
> point? I know, I know, that's unlikely to the point of non-existence.
>
>> - Unlike on e.g. Linux, CLOCK_REALTIME does not provide a better
>> resolution than gettimeofday().
> We can only use what the OS provides. Starting with Windows 8 there
> will be a new function call GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh706895%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
This would provide an easy solution for >= Win8: clock_gettime returns
GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime, clock_getres returns constant 1us.
Christian
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -