X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:47:31 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ftell() fails on files in shared folders
Message-ID:	<20120322094731.GX18032@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20120318191043 DOT GA32177 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJOtW+4UcSdbOqfch8Kzjh90FJP5ebtx-JJ7t8pGV2QZXiQ69A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120319091408 DOT GA30682 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJOtW+5Mf9uYfe6x8+HsDxWyUmT11DFvDAs1QE00uj5uOayfaA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120320120923 DOT GB20228 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJOtW+5iABpBo3FSLHp6ESn-P6ZetT1Xe-gVT10n4G-1aJX4pA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120320205003 DOT GJ18032 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJOtW+5TNZDByDbhZceKxn0QnQ76q505OL7HFw8m1MfGtsipbQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20120321093859 DOT GL18032 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAJOtW+48SuNYdwB+YgeiOgfvkmGp=KqG30-tqDf4TyeYfF--1g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAJOtW+48SuNYdwB+YgeiOgfvkmGp=KqG30-tqDf4TyeYfF--1g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar 21 21:02, Yuri Gribov wrote:
> Corinna,
> 
> > or it's the native NT equivalent NtQueryInformationFile function
> > with the FileStandardInformation info class.  Cygwin uses the latter.
> 
> My idea was that this was a known error but I did not find anything
> useful in google.
> 
> > Is it possible that some kind of virus checker influences the result?
> 
> I doubt this, slave nodes have pretty basic installation. They only
> have additional MS HPC Pack, MPICH2, ActivePerl, Python, Matlab
> runtime and VS redistribs.
> 
> I have checked installed programs and services and haven't found
> anything interesting (I have attached output of net start and tasklist
> in case you wanted to check).

Sorry, but I really don't know how to help here.  I can't reproduce
the problem and apparently nobody else can.  If that would be a 
generic bug, it would also affect a lot of tools.  I'm as puzzled
as you are.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -