| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <4F633293.1030300@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:31:15 +0100 |
| From: | marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Fork errors during toolchain build |
| References: | <4F6240ED DOT 5030101 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> |
| In-Reply-To: | <4F6240ED.5030101@cs.utoronto.ca> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 3/15/2012 8:20 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to build a crosstool chain under cygwin and I keep getting > blocked by fork errors -- in spite of having rebased just before > starting. Oddly, the errors come from scripts, not invocations of > just-built-gcc (which used to be the killer). Unfortunately, this means > there's no obvious culprit to target, because presumably the dlls bash, > sed, etc. use were rebased before the build ever started. > > Is there some way I can diagnose more precisely what binaries/dlls are > responsible so I can rebase the right things? I can't rule out the > existence of custom dlls, but I did rebase everything newly-built that I > could find. > > Thanks! > Ryan > I assume that for rebasing you are using rebaseall -T your_additional_file_list otherwise you could still have collisions. See "rebase -si" output for details. Are you sure is not a BLODA problem ? About fork diagnostics, the latest snapshots have some improvement, so you can try them http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |