delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:23:15 +0400 |
From: | Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru> |
Reply-To: | Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <846225147.20120315222315@mtu-net.ru> |
To: | "Sisyphus" <sisyphus1 AT optusnet DOT com DOT au>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Fw: Cygwin updates cause rebaseall errors |
In-Reply-To: | <FA9158D43A9C4E5DBD376E97087595B6@desktop2> |
References: | <468C8EDAC5AC4C82ABF574C6245B394A AT dumbopc> <20120314185022 DOT GB17575 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <FA9158D43A9C4E5DBD376E97087595B6 AT desktop2> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Greetings, Sisyphus! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Faylor" < >> I'd highly suggest not including pointers to random web sites >> as a method to fix this issue but, instead, point to the Cygwin FAQ and >> the Cygwin mailing list. > Seems a sane suggestion to me. > I'm a bit dubious about providing a hard link to > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures > as it seems like the sort of link that might change. > Would "Go to http://cygwin.com/faq/ and see the section 'How do I fix fork() > failures?'" be a better option ? You can safely give out the first link. Even if anchor name would be changed, the address of "nochunk" version of the document is unlikely to be changed any time soon. > But then .... I'm not so sure about the advice offered in that FAQ entry. It > says "Read the 'rebase' package README in /usr/share/doc/rebase/, and follow > the instructions there to run 'rebaseall'". > But, although I have a /usr/share/doc folder, I don't have a > /usr/share/doc/rebase/ folder. You have to (re)install rebase package... http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=rebase%2Frebase-4.0.1-1&grep=rebase -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 15.03.2012, <22:19> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |