X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<1331147075.29625.YahooMailClassic@web36704.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:04:35 -0800 (PST)
From:	cppjavaperl <cppjavaperl AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ldd fails when dll has no execute permissions
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:03 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I'll try to be clearer.  We obviously know how to scan an executable for
> dependent DLLs since cygcheck does it already (and actually cygwin
> itself does this) but we are not going to be modifying ldd to deal with
> the case of non-executable binaries.

I was not aware (until seeing it discussed elsewhere, shortly after my last post) that cygcheck had this capability already.

So, correct me if I'm wrong, it really doesn't have anything to do with mirroring ldd's behavior on Linux -- It's just that you don't view it as a problem worth spending time on.

Fair enough.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -