delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Mail-Handler: | MailHop Outbound by DynDNS |
X-Report-Abuse-To: | abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) |
X-MHO-User: | U2FsdGVkX1/bj/G1Ma/sZRxtNCv9uMuP |
Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:57:03 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ldd fails when dll has no execute permissions |
Message-ID: | <20120307175703.GA30404@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <1331141199 DOT 1263 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web36701 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <1331141199.1263.YahooMailNeo@web36701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:26:39AM -0800, cppjavaperl wrote: >Then I tried it on an old machine running SuSE 9.0 (kernel 2.4.21, even). >In this case, ldd fails only if the *program's* executable has no execute >permissions.? The dependent DLLs are not required to have executable >permissions -- all the dependent DLLs were enumerated whether they had the >executable permissions or not. I'll try to be clearer. We obviously know how to scan an executable for dependent DLLs since cygcheck does it already (and actually cygwin itself does this) but we are not going to be modifying ldd to deal with the case of non-executable binaries. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |