X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F5764E3.8090004@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:38:43 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for i686-pc-cygwin
References:	<4F575A90 DOT 8060201 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20120307130723 DOT GB14210 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F5763D9 DOT 8030602 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
In-Reply-To:	<4F5763D9.8030602@cs.utoronto.ca>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 07/03/2012 13:34, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 8:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar  7 07:54, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects
>>> to find<process.h>  and the file actually lives in
>>> <cygwin/process.h>  (see
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513).
>>>
>>> I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is
>>> broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move
>>> between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker
>>> rather than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it
>>> thinks (correctly) that the function exists.
>> See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2012-02/msg00041.html
>> We moved it back.  If you have it in cygwin/process.h, you didn't
>> update from 1.7.10 to 1.7.11.
> Ah, I do remember that, now that you mention, but I was running a 1.7.11
> snapshot and forgot to upgrade...
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply,
> Ryan

  Thanks for spotting that Ryan.  FTR, I figure it's not worth delaying the
GCC release to add a fix to support .10, since there were other significant
problems with it, and anyone who has it should be moving to .11 anyway.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -