X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4F575A90.8060201@cs.utoronto.ca>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:54:40 -0500
From:	Ryan Johnson <ryan DOT johnson AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for i686-pc-cygwin
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi all,

I tried to bootstrap the gcc-4.7 RC and it fails because it expects to 
find <process.h> and the file actually lives in <cygwin/process.h> (see 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513).

I'm asking here because the gcc devs thought this would mean 4.6 is 
broken as well, but I have 4.6.2 running. Did process.h perhaps move 
between 1.7.10 and 1.7.11? I guess configure must be using linker rather 
than preprocessor tests for presence of spawnve, because it thinks 
(correctly) that the function exists.

Thanks!
Ryan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -