X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:52:32 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setting TZ may break time() in non-Cygwin programs
Message-ID:	<20120304115232.GC18852@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4F4FD8C6 DOT 5000807 AT t-online DOT de> <20120302091317 DOT GD14404 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4F513D11 DOT 2080203 AT t-online DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4F513D11.2080203@t-online.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar  2 22:35, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar  1 21:15, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>TZ environment variable is set by default since base-files 4.0.7.
> >>
> >>Unfortunately this breaks the time() calculation for all non-Cygwin
> >>programs run from Cygwin if Microsoft C runtime (mscrt*.dll) is
> >>used. MS CRT evaluates TZ but supports only a very old syntax
> >>subset. IIRC this is the case since VS1.x (DOS/Win16) and did not
> >>change since at least VS10.
> >I'm sorry, but I really don't care enough.  If that's a problem, then
> >just unset TZ in your environment before calling non-Cygwin tools, no?
> 
> Of course, after tracking down the problem to the new TZ it is now
> easy to unset it :-)
> 
> No problem in scripts, but inconvenient and error prone for interactive use.
> 
> 
> >But, as usual, PTC.
> 
> OK, ...
> 
> >
> >Simple: Unset TZ for Win32 programs run from Cygwin.
> >
> >More flexible: Set (unset) TZ=CYGWIN_WINENV_TZ if this variable is
> >set (to empty). Otherwise keep TZ as is.
> >
> 
> would a patch for any of the above have a chance to get accepted?

If it's not getting too complicated, yes.  However, the second idea
I don't understand.  Can you explain this differently?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -