delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-Yahoo-SMTP: | QDdxPgyswBCK2bx7SNYDilAqkd6GnSZOMbWnqiDrvOLygeouYdY- |
Message-ID: | <4F51A0E0.3070606@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:41:04 -0600 |
From: | Robert Miles <robertmiles AT bellsouth DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
CC: | "Matt Seitz \(matseitz\)" <matseitz AT cisco DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem |
References: | <87pqcwoy16 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F5128 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F5128@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 3/2/2012 1:02 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >> From: Achim Gratz [mailto:Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de] >> >> I do and FTR: I don't want the cygwin Xorg server to be a dependency > to >> all programs that might use X because that would pull in a lot of >> packages that I have no use for on most systems. > Right, that would be a disadvantage of making "xinit" a dependency. > > My questions are: > > 1. How many people would need to install "xinit"? How many people > would not need to install "xinit"? > > 2. How much of an inconvenience would installing "xinit" present to > people who don't actually need it? > > 3. Is there some way to make both groups happy? For example, could we > have a "gitk+xinit" package to give people a clue that they might want > both (keeping the existing "gitk" package for people who don't need > "xinit")? > Would it be adequate to make the installation procedure direct the user to read a text file describing anything that is SOMETIMES needed, and where to find packages to provide it, and where to find similar text files describing any startup procedures needed? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |