X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	QDdxPgyswBCK2bx7SNYDilAqkd6GnSZOMbWnqiDrvOLygeouYdY-
Message-ID:	<4F5072B5.7060707@bellsouth.net>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:11:49 -0600
From:	Robert Miles <robertmiles AT bellsouth DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	Jeremy Bopp <jeremy AT bopp DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
References:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CE4 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com> <4F4FC897 DOT 1080604 AT redhat DOT com> <4F4FD01E DOT 1000808 AT bopp DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<4F4FD01E.1000808@bopp.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/1/2012 1:38 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 01:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 03/01/2012 10:53 AM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
>>> You don't think that Setup telling the user "package xyz requires
>>> package xinit" might at least tip off some users that running xyz now
>>> requires starting an X server?
>>>
>>> Even if it doesn't reduce the questions, would it at least reduce the
>>> problem of users now having to run Setup a second time to download and
>>> install the xinit package?
>> While I can't control whether Yaakov adds xinit as a dependency to
>> tcl-tk, I personally wouldn't mind adding xinit as a prereq to gitk and
>> git-gui, since I maintain that package.  There's still that annoyance
>> factor that just depending on xinit won't get X running, but at least it
>> will let you download all the bits in one run of setup.exe instead of
>> hitting the FAQ and finding out you have to rerun setup.exe.
> I don't think I've ever seen it, but does setup.exe support the notion
> of recommended and/or suggested packages?
>
> It seems that the main issue is that xinit is not a hard dependency of
> these tools/libraries and thus they should not have a hard dependency on
> xinit defined in the package definition.  However, it might make sense
> to make xinit a recommended dependency that setup.exe could offer to
> install by default or at least notify the user that they may want to
> install.
>
I suspect not, but I would like to see such recommended and/or suggested 
packages.
Back when I was using Cygwin gcc so I could learn C, m4 was not 
installed along
with it, and I believe that m4 should at least be shown as a recommended 
package
to go along with gcc.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -