X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	QDdxPgyswBCK2bx7SNYDilAqkd6GnSZOMbWnqiDrvOLygeouYdY-
Message-ID:	<4F506FF2.7010808@bellsouth.net>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:00:02 -0600
From:	Robert Miles <robertmiles AT bellsouth DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	"Matt Seitz \(matseitz\)" <matseitz AT cisco DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Recent upgrade to wish leads to a problem
References:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CF6 AT xmb-sjc-233 DOT amer DOT cisco DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C3129F4CF6@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/1/2012 12:07 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
> "Matt Seitz (matseitz)"
>> "Christopher Faylor" wrote:
>>
>>> In the meantime, if people are piling on to suggest this because they
>>> think it will cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to something
>>> please be assured that this will not happen.
>> OK, what would cause someone to add xinit as a dependency to
> something?
>
> One reason I keep asking this question is that I don't understand the
> rationale against adding xinit.
>
> I love that Setup will automatically install the dependencies I need to
> actually use a package.  Setup failing to install a dependency that most
> users will want seems like a step backwards.  So I am trying to
> understand the rationale behind this position.
>
> One of the frustrations I used to have with Linux was repeated cycles of
> "Package A needs package B, install B, Package B needs Package C,
> install C, Package C needs Package D, etc."  I like that modern package
> managers, like Cygwin Setup or Yum make it much easier by letting me
> just say "I want Package A", and the tool automatically installs all the
> dependencies for me.
Some questions for which answers might help you understand:

Does it always require xinit, or only sometimes?  If only sometimes, why 
should it always be installed even for computers where there is no need 
for it?

Note - I don't have the answers.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -